Historical analysis of the idea of the coherence of the text of the Holy Qur'an

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Ph.D. in Quranic studies and Hadith at Universityof Tehran

2 Quranic and Hadith Sciences,Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Coherence of the text of the Holy Qur'an has a long history in the Qur'anic studies and originated in the first Islamic centuries, as the acceptance of the coherence of the holy text of Qur'an is reflected in the issues of relevance of the verses and suras (Tanasub/ Mumasabat al-Ayat va al-Sovar), some Qur'an interpretations and works named Nazm al-Qur'an and Ijaz al- Qur'an. Nevertheless, the Qur'anic scholars did not have the same attitudes and approaches to this issue, especially in contemporary time that there are new theories and works written on this question by Muslim and non-Muslim scholars in different parts of the world, indicating inconsistent approaches and different methods to prove it. Therefore, in this present paper we adopted an analytical-historical approach to the study of this thought, the types of approaches, the origins and methods of Quranic scholars on the coherence of the text of the Qur'an.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  1. The Holy Quran
  2. Ālūsī SM. Rūh al-Maʽānī fī Tafsīr al-Qurʼan al-ʽAẓīm. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-ʽIlmīyah; 1415 AH.
  3. Anthony H. Johns. “The Qurānic Presentation of the Joseph Story. Naturalistic or Formulaic Language?” Approaches to the Quran. London: 1993; 37-70.
  4. Arberry AJ. The Koran Interpreted. New York: Simon and Schuster; 1996.
  5. Ayazi MA. Continues Face of the Qur’an (Chehreye Peyvasteye Quran). Tehran: Hastinama; 1380 HS.
  6. Bāqilānī MBT. Iʻjāz al-Qurʼān. Cairo: Dar al-Maʻārif; 1997.
  7. Bazargan A. Order of the Qur’an (Nazm-e Qur’an). Tehran: Qalam Publications; 1375 HS.
  8. Bell R. A Commentary on the Qur’an. Manchester: University of Manchester; 1991.
  9. Bell R. Introduction to the Quran. Edinburgh University Press; 1977.
  10. Bint al-Shāṭiʾ A. Al-'I'jāz al-Bayānī lil-Qur’an. Cairo: Dar Al-Ma'ārif; 1404 AH.
  11. Blachère R. Introduction au Coran. Trans: Ramyar M. Tehran: Islamic Publishing and Culture Office; 1378 HS.
  12. Bollateh E. “Literary Structures of the Qur’an (Sakhtarhaye Adabiye Quran)”. In The Encyclopedia of the Qur’an. Tehran: Hekmat; 1392; 207-320.
  13. Bostani M. Al-Tafsīr Al-Banā’ī lil-Qur’an Al-Karim. Mashhad: Astan Quds Razavi; 1420 AH.
  14. Buqā'ī I. Naẓm al-Durar fi Tanāsub al-'Āyāt wa al-Suwar. Lebanon: Dar al-Kutub al-‘Ilmīyya; 1995.
  15. Claude G, Larcher P. “Language and Style of the Quran”. Encyclopaedia of the Qurʾān. Leiden – Boston: Brill. 2003; vol. 3: 109-135.
  16. Cuypers M. “Semitic Rhetoric as a Key to the Question of the Naẓm of the Qur’anic Text”. Journal of Qur’anic Studies. 2011; no.13:1-24.
  17. Cuypers M. “The Semitic Rhetoric in the Koran and a Pharaonic Papyrus”. US-China Foreign Language. 2010; no.1: 8-13.
  18. Cuypers M. The Banquet: A Reading of the Fifth Sura of the Qur’an, Rhetorica Semitica. Miami: Convivium Press; 2009.
  19. Cuypers M. The Composition of the Qur'an. London: Bloomdbury; 2015.
  20. Darrāz M. Al-Madkhal ila Al-Qur'an Al-Karim. Kuwait: Dar al-Qalam; 1404 AH.
  21. Darrāz M. Al-Naba’ Al-‘Azīm: Naẓarāt Jadīdat fi Al-Qur'an Al-Karim. Dar al-Qalam; 1426 AH.
  22. Darwazah MI. Al-Tafsīr al-Hadith. Cairo: Dar al-Ihya' al-Kutub al-‘Arabīyah; 1383 AH.
  23. El-Awa SM. Textual Relations in the Qur'an: Relevance, Coherence and Structure. Routledge; 2006.
  24. Fakhr Rāzi Mb’U. Mafātīḥ al-Ghayb. Beirut: Dār Iḥyāʼ al-Turāth al-ʻArabī; 1420 AH.
  25. Goldziher I. Introduction to Islamic Theology and Law. Princeton; 1981.
  26. Hawwa S. Al-'Asās fi al-Tafsīr. Beirut: Dar al-Salam; 1409 AH.
  27. Jāḥiẓ ‘ABB. Rasā’il al-Jāḥiẓ. Research: Abdul Salam Muhammad Haroun. Cairo: Khānjī Library. 1384 AH.
  28. Jurjānī AQ. Asrār al-Bilāqah. Research: Shaker MM. Cairo-Jeddah: al-Madani; nd.
  29. Jurjānī AQ. Dalā’il al-'I'jāz fī ‘Ilm al-Ma'ānī. Research: Mohammad Tanjī. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-Arabī; 1995.
  30. Khamegar M. Geometric Structure of the Qur’anic Verses (Sakhtare Hendesiye Surehaye Quran). Tehran: Islamic Propagation Organization; 1386 HS.
  31. Khaṭṭābī AS. Bayān 'I'jāz al-Qur’an. Cairo: Dar al-Ma'ārif; 1955.
  32. Makvand M. “Reflection of the Coherence of the Qur’an Text in the Light of Symmetrical Order Theory (Emphasizing Michel Cuypers’s View). Qur’anic Studies: 1394 HS; 76; 4-34.
  33. Makvand M. Analysis on “Chiasmus” in the Structure of the Qur’an with Focus on Michèle Cuypers’s View [Dissertation]. Qom: Faculty of Theology and Islamic Studies, University of Qom; 1394.
  34. Mir M. Coherence in the Qur'an: a Study of Islahi's Concept of Nazm in Tadabbur-i Qur'an. Indiana: American Trust Publications; 1986.
  35. Mir M. Islāhī’s Concept of Sura-Pairs. Muslim World. 1983; vol. LXXIII:. 22-32.
  36. Mir, M. The Sura as a Unity: A Twentieth Century Development in Qur’an Exegesis. Approaches to the Qur’an. London: Routledge. 1993; 211-24.
  37. Murad-Walid M. Naẓarīyat al-Naẓm wa Qīmatuh al-‘Ilmīyah fi al-Dirāsāt al-Lughawīyah ‘Inda ‘Abd al-Qādir al-Jurjānī. Damascus: Dar al-Fikr; 1403 AH.
  38. Neuwirth A. Form and Structure of the Qur_ān. Encyclopaedia of the Qurān, Leiden–Boston: Brill. 2002; vol. 2: 245-266.
  39. Neuwirth A. Studien zur Komposition der Mekkanischen Suren. Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter; 1981.
  40. Neuwirth A. Sura(s). Encyclopaedia of the Qurān. Leiden–Boston: Brill. 2006; vol.2: 166-177.
  41. Neuwirth A. Vom Rezitationstext über die Liturgie zum Kanon: Zur Entstehung und Wiederauflosung der Surenkomposition im Verlauf der Entwicklung eines Islamischen Kultus. The Quran as Text. Leiden: Brill. 1996; 69-105.
  42. Qaraie Sultanabadi A. “Understanding the Qur’an in the Light of Its Network or Trans-Line Order”. Quranic Linguistic Researches. 1394 HS; 7: 41-60.
  43. Rafei'i M. 'I'jāz al-Qur’an wal-Balāghat al-Nabawīyah. Np: Dar al-Kitab al-Arabi; 1425 AH.
  44. Rippin A. Review of Neuwirth's Studien. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 45. 1982; 1: 149-50.
  45. Robinson N. Discovering the Qur_ān. A Contemporary Approach to a Veiled Text. Georgetown University Press; 2003.
  46. Robinson N. Hands Outstretched: Towards a Re-reading of Sūrat al- Māʾida.  Journal of Qur’anic Studies. 2001; 3:1 (no): 1–19.
  47. Robinson N. Islam a Concise Introduction. London-Richmond: Curzon Press; 1999.
  48. Robinson N. Sūrat Āl CImrān and Those with the Greatest Claim to Abraham. Journal of Qur’anic Studies. 2004; 6: 1-21.
  49. Robinson N. The Dynamics of Surah Āl ‘Imrān. Jonggyoui Saram, Seoul: Baobooks; 1999; 425-486.
  50. Robinson N. The Structure and Interpretation of Sūrat al-Mu’minūn. Journal of Qur’anic Studies. 2000; no. 2: 89-106.
  51. Rummani AH'ABI. Al-Nukat fi 'I'jāz Al-Qur’an in Thalāth Rasā'il fi 'I'jāz al-Qur’an. Cairo: Dar al-Ma'ārif; 1955.
  52. Sayed Quṭb. Fī Zilāl al-Qur’an. Beirut: Dar al-Shurūq; 1412 AH.
  53. Schmidtke S. Pairs and Paring. Encyclopaedia of the Qurān. Leiden – Boston: Brill. 2004; vol.4: 1-9.
  54. Siyūtī, JD. Tartīb Suwar al-Qur’an. Research: Sayed al-Jamīlī. Beirut: Al-Hilāl; 1986.
  55. Suyūtī JD. Al-Itqān fī Ulūm al-Qur’an. Beirut: Dār al-Kitāb ʻArabī; 1421 AH.
  56. Ṭabarī MbJ. Jāmi’ al-Bayān fī Tafsīr al-Qur’ān. Research: Ahmad Muhammad Shaker. Np: Al-Risālah; 1420 AH.
  57. Ṭabāṭabāyī MH. Al-Mīzān fi Tafsīr Al-Qurʼān. Qom: Teachers Community of Islamic Seminary; 1417 AH.
  58. Ṭabrisī FbḤ. Majamaʻ al-Bayān fī Tafsīr al-Qurʼān. Tehran: Naser Khosrow Publications; 1372 HS.
  59. Tavakoli Mohammadi N. and Pouya-zadeh A. “Examining the Function of Discourse Analysis in Proving Continues Text of the Holy Qur’an, Emphasizing the Approach of Neil Robson”. Qur’anic Studies and Islamic Culture; 1396-B: 4; 25-54.
  60. Tavakoli Mohammadi N. Critical Analysis of Principles and Method of N. Robson on Continues Harmony Text (Tanāsub) of the Holy Qur’an. PhD Thesis: University of Tehran; 1396 HS-A.
  61. Wadad K, Mir M. Literature and the Qur_ān. Encyclopaedia of the Qurān. Leiden – Boston: Brill. 2003; vol.3: 205-227.
  62. Wansbrough J. Quranic Studies, Sources and Methods of Scriptural Interpretation. Oxford; 1977.
  63. Zahniser M. Major Transitions and Thematic Borders in Two Long Sūras: al-Baqara and al-Nisa. Literary Structures of Religious Meaning in the Quran. Richmond: Curzon. 2000; pp. 26-55.
  64. Zahniser M. The word of God and the Apostleship of Isa. A narrative Analysis of Al-Imran (3:33-62). Journal of Semantic studies. 1991; no. 37: 77-112.
  65. Zarkashī BMBA. Al-Burhān fī ʻUlūm al-Qurʼān. Research: Mohammad Abolfazl Ebrahim, Cairo: Dār Iḥyāʼ al-Kutub al-ʻArabīyah; 1376 AH.
  66. ZarQānī MA. Manāhil Al-ʻIrfān fī ʻUlūm Al-Qurʼān. Np: Maṭba’at Isa al-Bābī al-Ḥalabī wa Shurakā’ihī; nd.
  67. Zovqi A. “A New Approach to the Study of the Textual Cohesion of the ‎Surahs of ‎the Holy Quran”. Qur’an and Hadith Studies; 1392 HS. 12: 151-177.

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 13 December 2018
  • Revise Date: 05 October 2019
  • Accept Date: 06 October 2019

Share

How to cite

Statistics