A Schematic Study of the “Piety” (Taqwā) Metaphors in Nahj al-Balagha’s Sermons (Based on the Evans’s and Green’s model)

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Phd Student Of Sciences Of Quran and Hadith; University of Al- Zahra; Tehran

2 Associate Professor, Department of Qur’an and Hadith Sciences, Al-Zahra University, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

Cognitive semantics is one of the main theories in semantics. One of the conceptual processes concerned by Scholars of cognitive semantics is imaginary schematic. The schemes are the primary levels of cognitive construction of the base of metaphor that allow us to link our physical experiences with more complex cognitive domains. Evans and Green (cognitive linguists) introduce conceptual schemas as a set of “visualization and conceptual structure”. In all religions, the concept of piety (taqwā) is one of the abstract concepts. Understanding “piety” is beyond our direct experience. Imam Ali (AS) in Nahj al-Balaghah used imaginary schemas to introduce piety and its consequences and, through degrading the spirituality to the realms of the senses, placed this spiritual concept to the level of understanding of all, especially Arabs of the Early Islam. The aim of this research is to study the representation of schematics of “piety” in Nahj al-Balaghe’s sermons based on the “Evans and Green”’s Schemes model in the framework of cognitive semantics, through a descriptive-analytical method. It seems that there are schematics of force, movement, density, unity, space, balance, consistency and existence (of object) in the textual context of hadiths. The power plan seems to be a blueprint of people’s experience, culture, and system of life and it is possible to justify two plans of homogeneity and existence with the subjective tendency to simulate what is around them. Various concepts have also contributed to the formation of piety schemes, including the body, the animal, the plant, the edible, the objects, the place, the natural elements, the four elements….

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  1.  

    1. The Holy Quran
    2. Al-Zamakhsharī MbU. Muqaddamat al-‘Adab. Tehran: The Institute of Islamic Studies; 1386 HS.
    3. Amin SNB. Makhzan al-Laālī dar Fazīlat-i Mawlá al-Mawālī Hazrat-i Alī ibn Abītālib (AS). Isfahan: Society of Supporting Homeless People of Esfahan, Neshat Publications; 1371 HS.
    4. Dashti M. Translation and Commentary of Nahj al-Balāghah. Qom: Zohour Shafaq; 1385 HS.
    5. Evans V. Bergen B. Inken J. (eds.). The Cognitive Linguistics Enterprise: An overview. The Cognitive Linguistics Reader, Equinox Publishers; 2007.
    6. Evans V. Green M. Cognitive Linguistics: An Introduction, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press; 2006.
    7. Houshangi H. Seify Pargou M. Conceptual Metaphors in the Qor’an According to Cognitive Aesthetics. Sciences and Teaching of the Holy Qur’an 1388 HS; 3: 9-34.
    8. Ibn Duraid MH. Jumhara fi 'l-Lughat. Beirut: Dar al-Ilm lil Malāein; 1988.
    9. Ibn Maitham al-Bahrani M. Commentaries on Nahj al-Balāghah. Trans. Mohammadi Moqhadam QA & Navayee Yahyazadeh AA. Mashhad:  Āstān-e Qods-e Razavi Publications Ltd; 1417 AH.
    10. Imani M. A Study on Prepositions in Holy Quran Based on Cognitive semantics. PhD dissertation. Tehran: Humanities and Literature College, University of Allameh Tabatabayee; 2017.
    11. Johnson M, Lakoff G. Why Cognitive Linguistics Embodied Realism. Cognitive Linguistics, 13-3; 2002.
    12. Johnson Mark. The Body in Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason, The University of Chicago Press; 1987.
    13. Kovecses Z. Metaphor: A Practical Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press; 2002.
    14. Lakoff G. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind, The University of Chicago Press; 1987.
    15. Langacker R.W. Cognitive Grammar: a Basic Instruction. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008.
    16. Luria A. Language and Cognition. Trans. Habib-Allah Ghasemzadeh. Tehran: Farhangian; 1998.
    17. Mostafayi Atefeh. A Review of the Concepts Piety and Insight and their Connection in Imam Ali's Views. M.A. Thesis. Thesis Advisor Ehsan Torkashvand. College of Literature and Humanities: University of Malayer; 2017.
    18. Motahari M. A Selection of Works. Vol. 23. Tehran & Qom: Sadra; 1377 HS.
    19. Motahari M. Seiry dar Nahj al-Balāghah (A Journey through Nahj al-Balagha). Qom: Dar Al-Tablīgh Islami; 1976.
    20. Muhammad Qasemi H. The Representations of Imaginal Art in Nahj al-Balāghah. Tehran: Elmi Farhangi Publications; 2009.
    21. Pour-Ebrahim Sh. A Linguistic Analysis of Metaphor in the Quran: The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor (Cognitive Framework). PhD dissertation. Tehran: Tabiat Modarres University; 1388 HS.
    22. Qarashi AA. Qamoos-e Qur’an. Tehran: Dar al-Kitāb al-Islamiah; 1371 HS.
    23. Rāghib Isfahani MbH. Al-Mufradat fi Gharib al-Quran. Tehran: Mortazavi; 1374 HS.
    24. Rasekh Mahand M. Fundamental Principles and Concepts of Cognitive Linguistics. Boukhara Journal 1386 HS; 63: 172-191.
    25. Roshan B & Ardabili L. An Introduction to Cognitive Semiotics. Tehran: Elm; 1392 HS.
    26. Safavi K. A Discussion on Visual Schemata Based on Cognitive Semantics. Name Farhangestan 1382 HS; 2: 65-85.
    27. Steen G.J. The five Step Procedure for Metaphor. Identification Style 2002; 36 (3): 386-407.
    28. Takahashi H. A Cognitive Linguistic Analysis of the English Imperative: Reference to Japanese Imperatives. Amsterdam: john Benjamin’s; 2012.
    29. Talmy Leonard. Toward a Cognitive Semantics. Cambridge: MT Press; 2000.
    30. Turayhī FM. Majma' al-Baḥrayn. Tehran: Murtadawi; 1375 HS.
    31. Yousefi-Rad F. Study of The Metaphor of Time in Persian Language in Terms of Cognitive Semantics. M.A. Thesis. Tarbiat Modarres University; 2004.
    32. Yu N.  The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. B.V; 1998.
    33. Yu N. Chinese Metaphors of Thinking. Presented at the 7th International Cognitive Linguistics Conference, cognitive Linguistics, 2003: 14-2/3.

     

     

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 14 October 2019
  • Revise Date: 03 March 2020
  • Accept Date: 05 March 2020

Share

How to cite

Statistics