Abraham discourse with opponents in the Qur'an Based on the classification of speech actions of Searle

Document Type : Research Paper

Author

Assistant Professor, Department of History, Alzahra University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Abstract

An important part of the dimensions of the mission of the prophets in responding to the opposite audience and trying to persuade and inform them in terms of behavioral and spoken behaviors in the Qur'an has been widely reflected. Prophet Ibrahim was one of the divine prophets who, in an argumentative manner, had a variety of spoken actions for spreading a monotheistic discourse that differed in terms of form and content from the existing religious discourse (worship of natural elements and idolatry) in Mesopotamia, Suitable for attracting an opposing audience. This article, by utilizing the categorization of Sural's speech acts (expressive, inclusive, emotional, commitment and declarative), is intended to characterize Abraham's speeches in dealing with dissent based on the exegesis of Quranic verses.

The findings of the research show that the spoken action of the statement intended to introduce and describe the monotheistic discourse with the purpose of its semantic propagation and fixation has been the highest and the most pronounced speech action of the least frequent. It seems that the most important factor influencing the frequency of speech-making expression is the overcoming and hegemonicization of the discourse of the multiplicity of gods in society, which Abraham tried to use with this appropriate context to highlight the discourse of monotheism and to marginalize the dominant discourse.

Keywords

References

  1.  

    1. The Holy Quran.
    2. Abu al-Futūḥ Rāzī Ḥ. Rawḍ al-Jinān wa Rawḥ al-Janān fī Tafsīr al-Qurʾān. Mashhad: Islamic Research Foundation of Astan Quds Raḍawī; 1408 AH.
    3. Acheoah, john Emike, “Searle s speech act theory: An integrative Appraisal”, American research journal of English and literature, volume 2017.
    4. Agha Golzadeh F. Critical Discourse Analysis. Tehran: Scientific and Cultural Publications; 2006.
    5. Biazar Shirazi A. Archeology and Historical Geography of Qur’anic Stories. Tehran: Islamic Culture Contributing Office; 2001.
    6. Bustani FA. Abjad Glossary. Translated by Reza Mahyar. Theran; 1996.
    7. Diniwarī AbD. Al-Akhbār Al–Ṭiwāl. Researched by Abdul al–Mun'im ‘Āmir. Qom: Al–Radi Publications; 1989.
    8. Fakhr al-Dīn Rāzī MbʻU. Mafātīh al-Ghayb. 3rd p. Beirut: Dār ʼIḥyāʼ al-Turāth al-ʻArabī; 1420 Ah.
    9. Fazaeli M. and Negaresh M. Analysis of the Fifty First Sermon Based on Serel`s Division of Speech Actions. Quranic and Hadith Sciences 2011, 86.
    10. Girshman R. Iran from the Beginning to Islam. Translated by Mohammad Moeen. Tehran: Scientific and Cultural Publications; 2001.
    11. Ibn Kathir I'U. Al-Bidāya wa-Nihāya. Beirut: Dar al-Fikr; 1407 AH.
    12. Ibn Khaldūn, 'ARbM. al-Tārīkh. Research: Khalīl Shahhādah. Beirut: Dār al-Fīkr; 1408 AH.
    13. Ibn Manẓūr MbM. Lisān al- ‘Arab. 3rd ed. Beirut: Dar al-Sādir; 1414 AH.
    14. Jabri S and Jafari M. Reflection of Social Conditions in the Analysis of Verbal Actions of Mystical Interpretation of Kashf al-Asrār. Quarterly Journal of Persian Language and Literature 2016, 233. 
    15. Jalali M and Sadeghi M. Speech Actions and Its Relationship with Gender and Social Class in Garshabnameh. Historical Sociology 2016 8 (1).
    16. Jan Nas. Comprehensive History of Religions. Translated by: Ali Asghar Hekmat. Tehran: Pirooz; 1975.
    17. Mashadi MbM. Tafsīr Kanz al-Daqāʼiq wa Baḥr al-Gharāʼib. Tehran: Ministry of Islamic Culture & Guidance; 1989.
    18. Masoudī AbH. Al-Tanbīh wal-Ishrāf. Corrected by Abdullah Ismail Al-Sāwī. Cairo: Dar Al-Sāwī.
    19. Meibudī RDAbAS. Kashf al-Asrār wa ‘Uddat al-'Abrār. Tehran: Amir Kabir Publications; 1371 HS.
    20. Mughniyah MJ. Al-Tafsīr al-Kāshif. Qom: Dar al-Kutub al-Islāmi; 1424 AH.
    21. Muqaddasī MbT. Al-Bad’ wal-Ta’rīkh. Researched by: Bur Saeed. Np: Maktabat al-Thiqāfīyah al-Dinīyah.
    22. Mushkoor MJ. Summary of Religions in the History of Great Religions. Tehran: Shargh Publications; 1998.
    23. Mustafawī. H. Al-Tahqīq fī Kalamāt al-Qurʼan al-Karīm. Beirut: dar al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyah; 1430 Ah.
    24. Pahlavannezhad MR. Estahbanati. A review of Speech Actions in the Speeches of the Presidents of Iran and the United States in September 2006 at the United Nations. Foreign Language Researches, Faculty of Literature and Humanities of University of Tabriz 2008, 51.
    25. Qonabadi SM. The Commentary of Bayān Al-Sa'āda Fī Maqāmāt al-‘Ibādah. Beirut: Al-A'lami Foundation for Publications; 1988.
    26. Rajabzadeh M. et all. Textual Analysis of the Manual for the Pilgrimage of Imam Reza (AS) Based on the Theory of Speech Action. Quarterly Journal of Epistemology 2010, 43.
    27. Saeedi A. and Hussein Yusuf M. Al-'Ifṣāḥ fī Fiqh al-Lughah. Qom: Maktab al-‘Alām al-Islamī; 1990.
    28. Saeedi A. Ontology of Meaning. Philosophical Knowledge 2011, 9(34).
    29. Safavid K. An Introduction to Semantics. Tehran: Sureh Mehr Publications; 2004.
    30. Safavid K. Applied Semantics. Tehran: Hamshahri; 2003.
    31. Saneipour MR. Analytical Principles of Speech Work in the Holy Qur'an. Tehran: Imam Sadegh University; 2011.
    32. Sarton G. History of Sciences. Translate by Ahmad Aram. Tehran: Amir Kabir Publications; 1967.
    33. Seyed Reza MS. Mutual Reactions to the Invitation of Prophet Ibrahim (AS). Ma'rifat 2002, 57.
    34. Suyūṭī Jʻ. Al-Itqān fī ʻUlūm al-Qurʼan. Researched: Saeed al-Mandūb. Beirut: Dar al-fikr; 1416 AH.
    35. Ṭabarī MbJ. Jāmiʻ al-Bayān fī Tafsīr al-Qur’an. Beirut: Dār al-Maʻrifah; 1412 AH.
    36. Ţabarī MbJ. Tā’rīkh al-ʼUmam wal-Mulūk (Tā’rīkh al-Ţabarī). Beirut: Dar al-Turāth; 2010.
    37. Ṭabarī MDj. Tārīkh al-Ṭabarī.Beirut: Dār al-Turāth; 2008.
    38. Ṭabātabāeī MH. Al-Mīzān fī Tafsīr Al-Qur’ān. Qom: Islamic Publications of Teachers’ Society of Islamic Seminary; nd.
    39. Ṭabrisī FbḤ. Majmaʻ al-Bayān fī Tafsīr al-Qur’an. 3rd p. Tehran: Naser Khosrow; 1993.
    40. Ṭūsī MbḤ. Al-Tibyān fī Tafsīr al-Quran. Beirut: Dār ʼIḥyāʼ al-Turāth al-ʻArabī; nd.
    41. Yari A. The Method of Augmenting and How Ibrahim (AS) Confronted with the Polytheists and Idolaters Based on the Qur’anic Verses. Roshd-e Amouzesh 2004. 5.
    42. Yu'qūbī AbAY. Ta'rīkh al-Ya'qūbī. Beirut: Dar al-Sadir; nd.

    Zubaydī MM. Tāj al-ʻArūs. Beirut: Dār al-Fikr; 1414 AH

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 17 June 2019
  • Revise Date: 04 June 2020
  • Accept Date: 08 December 2020

Share

How to cite

Statistics