The Application of Intertextual Reading in Reconstructing the Historical Context of the Qur’anic verses (case study: The Story of Abel and Cain)

Document Type : Research Paper

Author

Associate Professor, Department of Qur’an and Hadith Sciences, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Kharazmi University

Abstract

Reconstructing the historical context of the verses, the situation in which the Qur'anic text has been formed, from various aspects, in particular explaining the exact meaning of the verses, is a difficult, significant and fruitful matter. However, little authentic evidence is available for this purpose. We know that the Qur'an in many cases speaks considering the traditions and teachings mentioned in sacred Jewish-Christian texts, that have been current in the mouth of the people of the age of revelation. Therefore, Intertextual reading is very effective in restoring the text of the Qur'an as an authentic historical document and, as a result, in reconstructing the historical context of the verses and recognizing the audience of the age of revelation. In the present study, based on this approach, we have studied the intertextual reading of verses27-32of Surat al-Ma'idah related to the story of Abel and Cain. Re-reading the Qur'an and sacred Jewish-Christian texts, including the Old Testament, the New Testament, and the Talmud, shows that the story is narrated similarly and the language is symbolic. However, the Qur'an does not merely retell the story but modifies these texts and creates new meanings according to its audience in the age of revelation. The intertextual reading shows that verses 27-32 of Surat al-Ma'idah are related to the tension between the 7th century AD Jews in the Arabian Peninsula and the Prophet of Islam; they intend to betray the Prophet again and kill him. Finally, considering some historical narratives along with the intertextual reading indicates that the above verses refer to the treachery of the Jews of Khaybar around year 7 (AH).
 

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  1.  

    1. The Holy Quran.
    2. Ālūsī, Maḥmūd ibn ʻAbd Allāh (1415 AH), Rūḥ al-Maʻānī fī Tafsīr al-Qurʼān al-ʻAẓīm wa al-Sabʻ al-Mathanī. Research: Atīyya Ali Abdulbārī. Beirut: Dar Al-Kutub Al-'Ilmiyyah.
    3. Ibn Sa'd Muhammad (1968), Al-Tabaqāt Al-Kubrā, Beirut: Dar Sader.
    4. Ibn Sallām Herawī Abu ‘Ubayd Al-Qāsim (1415 AH), Fadā’il al-Qur’an, Beirut: Dar Ibn Kathir.
    5. Ibn ‘Āshūr, Muhammad ibn Tāhir (nd), Al-Tahrīr wal-Tanwīr, Np.
    6. Ibn Hishām Abdulmaled (nd), Al-Sīrah Al-Nabawīyah, Cairo: Printing Company of Al-Fannīyat al-Muttahidah.
    7. Alborzi, Parviz and Mansoori M, Masoud (2014), “A Study of the Macro Text of the Qur’an: Based on Redefinition of Intertextuality”, Linguistic Research in the holy Qur’an, 1: 76-61.
    8. Bazargan, Mehdi (2006), Evaluation of the Qur’an, Tehran: Enteshar Sahami Company.
    9. Tirmidhī, Muhammad ibn Ali (1981),Al-Sunan, İstanbul: Dar al-Fikr.
    10.  Jaberi Mohammad (2009), Fahm al-Qur’an al-Hakim: al-Tafsīr al-Wādih Hasba Tartib al-Nuzūl, Maghreb: Dar al-Bayda.
    11.  Jamal Bassam (2005), Asbāb Al-Nuzūl, Beirut: Mo’assesit al-‘Arabīya li Tahdith al-Fikrīya: Al-Markaz aL-Thaqāfī.
    12.  Hakim Nayshābūrī, Muhammad ibn Abdullah (1978), Al-Mustadrak ‘ala al-Sahīhayn fi al-Hadīth, Beirut.
    13.  Dānī, ‘Uthman ibn Saeed (1994), Al-Bayān fī ‘Add Āya Al-Qur’an, Kuwait: Markaz al-Makhtūtāt wa-Turāth.
    14. Robinson, Nil (2004), “Christ in the Qur’an, Historic Christ and the Myth of Incarnation,” Trans: Mohammad Kazem Shaker, Haft Aseman, 24: 147-168.
    15.  Ramyar, Mahmoud (1990), History of the Qur'an, Tehran: Amirkabir.
    16.  Rashidreza, Mohammad (1990), Tafsir Al-Manār, Cairo: Al-Hay’at al-Misrīyah al-‘Āmma lil-Kitāb.
    17.  Zarkashī Badr al-Din (1978), Al-Burhān fī ‘Ulūm al-Qur’an, Beirut: Dār Ihyāʼ al-Kutub al-ʻArabīyah.
    18.  Sasani, Farhad (2005), “The Influence of Intertextual Relations on the Interpretation of Texts,” Language and Linguistics 2: 55-39.
    19. Suyūṭī, Jalal alDin (1404 AH), Al-Durr al-Manthūr fī al-Tafsīr bil-Ma’thūr, Qom: Ayatullah Mar’ashi Najafi’s Library.
    20.  Samarqandī, Nasr ibn Muhammad (nd), Bahr aL-‘Ulūm, Np.
    21.  Sharafudin, Jafr (1420 AH), Al-Mawsū'at al-Qur’anīyah, Beirut: Dar al-Taqrīb Bayn al-Mazāheb al-Islamī.
    22.  Ṭabāṭabāeī, Sayed Muhammad Hussein (1417 AH), Al-Mīzān fī Tafsīr al-Qurʼan. Qom: Islamic Publications Office.
    23.  Ţabrisī Fadl ibn Hassan (1994), Majmaʽ al-Bayān fī Tafsīr al-Qur’an. 3rd ed. Tehran: Naser Khosrov Publications.
    24.  Ţabarī Muhammad ibn Jarīr (1412 AH), Jāmi’ al-Bayān 'an Ta’wīl 'aya al-Qur’an, Beirut: Dar Al-Marifah.
    25.  Ṭūsi Sheikh, Muhammad Ibn Hassan (nd), Al-Tibyān fi Tafsir al-Qur’an, Beirut: Dar Ihyā al-Turāth al-Arabi.
    26.  Ayāshī, Muhammad ibn Masūd (1380 AH), Ketāb Al-Tafsīr, Tehran: Elmiye Publishing.
    27.  Fakhr al-Dīn Rāzī, Muhammad ibn ‘Umar (1420 AH), Mafātīh al-Ghayb, 3rd ed, Beirut: Dar ʼIḥyāʼ al-Turāth al-ʻArabī.
    28.  Majlisī Muhammad Baqer (1403 AH), Biḥār Al-'Anwār, Beirut: Dar 'Ihya' al-Turath al-Arabi.
    29.  Muqātil ibn Suleiman (1423 Ah), Tafsīr Muqātil bin Sulaymān, Beirut: Dar Iḥyāʼ al-Turāth.
    30.  Jeffry, Arthur (1954), Muqaddamatān fī ‘Ulūm al-Qur’ān, Cairo: Maktabat al-Khanjī.
    31.  Makarem Shirazi, Nasser et al. (1995), The Commentary of Nemouneh, Tehran: Dar al-Kutub al-Islamiyah.
    32.  Neuwirth Angelika (2014), “Two faces of the Qur’an: Qur’an and Mushaf,” Trans. Mehdi Ezzati Araste and Mohammad Ali Tabatabaei, Tafsīr Ahl al-Bayt (AS), 1: 83-112.
    33.  Wahidī, Ali ibn Ahmad (1411 AH), Asbāb al-Nuzūl, Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmīyah.
    34.  Yorgensen, M (2014), Theory and Method in Discourse Analysis,  Trans: Hadi Jalili, Tehran: Ney.
    35.  Allen G (2000), Intertextuality, London: Routledge.
    36.  Armstrong, Karen (2014), Fields of Blood, Religion and the History of Violence, New York: Anchor Books.
    37.  Beaugrande, R. de. and W. U. Dressler (1992), Introduction to Text Linguistics, London, New York: Longman.
    38.  Bell, Richard (1960), The Qur’ān, Translated with a Critical Rearrangement of the Surahs, Edinburgh University Press
    39.  Busse, H, (2002), “Cain and Abel”, in The Encyclopaedia of the Qurān, Leiden–Boston: Brill., vol. 1, pp. 270-272.
    40.  Crystal, David (2008), A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics, Malden: Blackwell Publishing.
    41.  Cuypers, Michel (2009), The Banquet: A Reading of the Fifth Sura of the Qur’an, Rhetorica Semitica, Miami: Convivium Press.
    42.  Firestone, Reuven (2019), “Muhammad, the Jews, and the Composition of the Qur’an: Sacred History and Counter-History”, Religions, 10 (63): 1-16.
    43.  Geiger, Abraham (1898), Judaism and Islam: A Prize Essay, Trans from German by F.M. Young, India: Madras.
    44.  Jackson, Wayne (September 21, 2019) »A Study of Biblical Types«, Available at: www.christiancourier.com.
    45. Jackson, Wayne, (September 21, 2019), A Study of Biblical Types, www.christiancourier.com.
    46. Nöldeke, Theodor, (2013), The History of the Qur'an, Leiden: Brill.
    47.  Nöldeke, Theodor (2013), The History of the Qur'an, Leiden: Brill.
    48.  Plett, Henrich F. (ed.) (1991), Intertextuality, Berlin: De Gruyter.
    49.  Robinson, Neal, (1991), Christ in Islam and Christianity, Albany: State University of New York Press.
    50.  Robinson, Neal, (2001), “Hands Outstretched: Towards a Re-reading of Sūrat al-Māʾida,” Journal of Qur’anic Studies, 3 (1): 1–19.
    51.  Van Wolde, Ellen (1991). “The story of Cain and Abel: A narrative study”, Journal for the Study of the Old Testament, 52: 25-41.
    52.  https://www.bible.com/bible/904.
    53.  https://www.biblica.com.

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 12 April 2020
  • Revise Date: 16 July 2020
  • Accept Date: 21 September 2020

Share

How to cite

Statistics