A study of the naming of the Ashbah sermon based on Jacobsen's theory

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 bu ali sina

2 Bu ali sina

Abstract

Roman Jacobsen, one of the founders of the Prague School of Role-Oriented Linguistics, believes that every linguistic construct has a purpose that must be explained in terms of its communication objectives, and that linguistic constructs are based on the centrality of each of the six pillars of the message: speaker, listener, message, message context, communication tool, and message components, which have six functions: emotional, persuasive, literary, referential, empathetic, and cryptic. The Ashbāh Sermon consists of a collection of referential sentences that have been delivered for educational purposes; Commentators disagree about the name of this sermon. This paper aims to understand the reason for naming this sermon and the effect of verbal communication process on this naming, assuming that the naming is in fact the perceptual limitation of human beings and Imam’s knowledge to this matter. The research method is descriptive-analytical with a linguistic approach, in the light of which the elements of the messages of this sermon based on Roman Jacobsen’s theory are examined in order to answer the question of “which feature of verbal communication is used by Imam (AS) to create this perception in the audience of human perceptual limitations?” Finally, it is proved that Imam (AS) by using the possibility of truth and falsity of reference messages, succeeded in creating a conscience understanding of human perceptual limitations in the audience.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  1.  

    1. The Holy Qur’an.
    2. Nahj al-Balaghah (2006) (Translated by Mohammad Dashti), 1st edition, Tehran: Alhadi.
    3. Ibn Fāris, Abi Al-Hussein Ahmad (1429 AH), Mu'jam Maqāyīs al-Lughah, Beirut: Dar 'Ihyā' al-Trāth al-Arabi.
    4. Ibn Miytham Bahrānī, Kamāl al-Dīn (2010), Sharh Nahj al-Balaghah (Translated by Ghorban Ali Mohammadi Moghaddam and Ali Asghar Navaei Yahyazadeh), Mashhad: Islamic Research Foundation.
    5. Echo, Umberto et al. (2004), Metaphor, the basis of thinking and tools of beautification (trans. Farhad Sasani), Tehran: Surah Mehr.
    6. August, Jan (1997), Philosophy in the Twentieth Century (trans. Reza Davari Ardakani), Tehran: Samt.
    7. Dinparvar, Jamaluddin (2000), Persian Nahj al-Balaghah, Tehran: Nahj al-Balaghah Publications.
    8. Sojoudi, Farzan and Naderi, Mazaher Mohammad (1998), “Prague School Poetry”, Quarterly Journal of Language and Literature 2(5), Allameh Tabātabā’ī University.
    9. Sakākī, Yusuf Ibn Umar (2000), Miftāh al-‘Uloom (by the efforts of Abd al-Hamid Hindāwī), Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-‘Ilmīyah.
    10. Sadūq, Mohammad Ibn Ali Ibn Hussein Ibn Babiwayh Qumī (2019), Al-Tawhid, Qom: Publications of the Seminary Teachers Association.
    11. Safavi, Kourosh (2001), From Linguistics to Literature, Volume 1, Edition 2, Tehran: Sureh Mehr.
    12. Tabātabā’ī, Mohammad Hossein (1989), Principles of Philosophy and Method of Realism, Volume 2, Qom: Sadra.
    13. Askarī, Abu Hilāl Hassan Ibn Sahl (1984), Dīwān al-Ma'ānī, Beirut: Dar al-Jail.
    14. Faller, Roger; Jacobsen, Roman; Lodge, David (1990), Linguistics and Literary Criticism (Translated by Maryam Khozan and Hossein Payendeh), Tehran: Ney.
    15. Goldman, Lucien (1990), Developmental Criticism (Translated by Mohammad Taghi Ghiyasi), Tehran: Bozorgmehr.
    16. Likaf, George and Johnson Mark (2015), The Metaphors We Live With (Translated by Hajar Agha Ebrahimi), Tehran: Alam.
    17. Majlisi, Mohammad Baqir (nd), Bihār Al-Anwār, Volume 54, Tehran: Islamic Publishing.
    18. Masbough, Seyyed Mehdi (2013), “Intertextual Relations of the Qur’an with the Sermons of Nahj al-Balaghah”, Quarterly Journal of Research of Qur'an and Hadith Sciences 10(2), Al-Zahra University.
    19. Mustafa, Ibrahim et al. (2008), Al-Mu'jam Al-Wasīt, Beirut: Dar Al-Da'wa, Arabic Language Association.
    20. Makarem Shirazi, Nasser et al. (2007), Message of Amir al-Mu'menīn (AS), Tehran: Islamic Bookstore.
    21. Movahed, Zia (1995), “Gottlob Frege and Logical Analysis of Language”, Organon Quarterly 7&8.
    22. Mahdavi-Noor, Seyed Hatem and Yousefsani, Seyed Mahmoud (2015), “Comparison of error in mystical experiences based on the theory of acquired science and presence science of Allameh Tabātabā’ī and the constructivism of Steven Katz”, Journal of Mind, Winter, Issue 64.
    23. Jacobsen, Roman (1990), Two Metaphorical and Virtual Poles (translated by Ahmad Okhowat, Book of Poetry), Isfahan: Mash'al.
    24. Svoboda, Alesh (1990), “A Short history of the Prague Linguistic Circl and its syntactic followers in Czechoslovaka”.

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 17 April 2021
  • Revise Date: 02 July 2021
  • Accept Date: 17 July 2021

Share

How to cite

Statistics