A structural view of Qur'anic surahs is one of the new methods in studying Qur'anic chapters. A way to prove the principle of this issue (not the method of its implementation) is to pay attention to the syntactic connections of the sentences within the Qur’anic surahs. Most syntactic scholars have mentioned 17 roles for sentences, of which the syntactic connection of 16 with other words and sentences is quite clear. It is only the role of the appellant (istīnāfīya) that is discussable. There are a total of three types of appellant sentences; explanatory, expressive and initial. The relation of the explanatory and expressive appellant sentences with before is clear, as it is explanation or clarification of a topic in the previous sentences. However, this is not the case with the initial appellant sentences. Of the 28,495 sentences in the Qur'an (according to the latest practical count), 428 have been claimed to be elementary appellant. The scholars of the Qur'an signing, as they did not see any connection between them and the other sentences, mentioned these cases as preliminary appellants. On the other, their main goal was not to find the connections between all sentences. Carefully examining them, it is proved that there are other roles may be considered for these sentences and the priority is with these roles. Therefore, it seems that there is no sentence in the surahs that its connection to the previous is not clear. Finally, in terms of syntactic communication, the Qur’anic surahs have very strong connections that can be claimed to have a very coherent structure.
Bahjatpour, Abdolkarim (2013), Commentary Based on the Order of Revelation, Tehran: Research Institute of Islamic Culture and Thought.
Bayḍāwī, ʻAbdullāh ibn ʻUmar (1418 AH), Anwār al-Tanzīl wa Asrār al-Taʼwīl, Beirut: Dar Iḥyā al-Turāth al-ʻArabī.
Parwini, Khalil et al (2015), “The semantics of the accusation of madness to the Prophet (PBUH), based on the Qur’anic answers,” Qur’anic Linguistic Research 4(7): 77-99.
Taghavian, Abbas, “The typology of the context in Almizan Commentary: figuration and function,” Researches of Qur’an and Hadith Sciences 6(12): 127-148.
Thaʻālabī, ʻAbd al-Raḥmān ibn Muhammad (1418 AH), Jawāhir al-Ḥisān, Beirut: Dar Iḥyāʼ al-Turāth al-ʻArabī.
Thaʻālabī Nayshābūrī, Aḥmad ibn Ibrāhim (1422 AH), Al-Kashf wa al-Bayān, Beirut: Dar Iḥyāʼ al-Turāth al-ʻArabī.
Sharifinasab, Hamed (2020), A Study of the Meaning Extent of the Absolute and General Statements in the Holy Qur’an: Principles and Viewpoints, PhD Thesis, Faculty of Theology, University of Tehran.
Ṣāḥib ibn ʻAbbād, Ismāʻīl ibn ʻAbād (1414 AH), Al-Muḥīṭ Fī al-Lughah, Beirut: ʻᾹlam al-Kutub.
Sāfī, Muhammad (1418 H), Al-Jadwal, Damascus-Beirut: Dar al-Rashid- Institute of al-Imān.
Sadr, Mohammad-baqer (1405 AH), Dorūs fi ‘lm al-‘Usū, Beirut: Dar al-Montazar.
Ṭabāṭabāʼī, Sayed Muhammad Ḥusayn (1417 AH), Al-Mizān fī Tafsīr al-Qur’an, Qom: Teachers Association of Qom Seminary, fifth ed.
Ṭabarisī, Faḍl ibn Ḥassan (1993), Majmaʻ al-Bayān fī Tafsīr al-Qur’an, Tehran: Nasser Khosrov, third ed.
Ṭabarī, Muhammad ibn Jarīr (1412 AH), Jāmiʻ al-Bayān fī Tafsīr al-Qur’an, Beirut: Dār al-Maʻrifah.
Ṭūsī, Muhammad ibn Ḥassan (nd), Al-Tibyān Fī Tafsīr al-Qur’an, Beirut: Dār ʼIḥyāʼ al-Turāth al-ʻArabī.
Ṭūsī, Muhammad ibn Ḥassan (1407 AH), Tahdhīb al-Ahkām, Tehran: Dār al-Kutub al-ʻIlmīyah.
Tayyeb-Hosseyni and Sharifinasab (nd), “Semantics of the word Majnoun (insane) in the Holy Qur’an,” Qur’anic Teachings 13(23): 107-128.
Fakhr al-Dīn Rāzī, Muhammad ibn ʻUmar (1420 AH), Mafātīh al-Ghayb, Beirut: Dār ʼIḥyāʼ al-Turāth al-ʻArabī.
Firouzābādī, Muhammad (nd), Al-Qāmūs al-Muhīt, Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʻIlmīyah.
Qurṭubī, ʼAḥmad ibn Muhammad (1985), Al-Jāmiʻ li ʼAḥkām al-Qur’an, Tehran: Nasser Khosrov.
Kalbāsī, Zahra and Ahmadnezhād, Amir (2017), “The meaning of the ninth verse of Surah Al-Hijr on the non-changeable of the Holy Qur’an,” Ketābe Qayyem 7(17): 101- 125.
Kulaynī, Muhammad ibn Yaʻqūb (1407 AH), Al-Kāfī, Tehran: Dār al-Kutub al-Islāmiyah.
Mustafawī, Hassan (1989), Al-Taḥqīq fī Kalamāt al-Qurʼan al-Karīm, Tehran: Ministry of Islamic Culture and Guidence.
Muqātil, Muqātil ibn Sulaymān (1423 AH), Tafsīr Muqātil ibn Sulaymān, Beirut: Dar Iḥyāʼ al-Turāth Al-Arabi.
Meybudī, Ahmad ibn Muhammad (1992), Kashf al-Asrār wa ʻUddah al-Abrār, Tehran: Amīr Kabīr Publications.
Nuhhās, Ahmad (1421 AH), 'I'rāb al-Qurʼan, Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʻIlmīyah.
Wāqidī, Muhammad ibn Omar (1409 AH), Al-Maqāzī, Beirut: Dār al-'A'lamī.
Sharifinasab, H., & Faghizadeh, A. (2021). Analysis of Allameh Tabatabai's method in interpreting general and absolute verses in a specific context. Researches of Quran and Hadith Sciences, 18(3), 33-67. doi: 10.22051/tqh.2021.34049.3045
MLA
Hamed Sharifinasab; Abdolhadi Faghizadeh. "Analysis of Allameh Tabatabai's method in interpreting general and absolute verses in a specific context". Researches of Quran and Hadith Sciences, 18, 3, 2021, 33-67. doi: 10.22051/tqh.2021.34049.3045
HARVARD
Sharifinasab, H., Faghizadeh, A. (2021). 'Analysis of Allameh Tabatabai's method in interpreting general and absolute verses in a specific context', Researches of Quran and Hadith Sciences, 18(3), pp. 33-67. doi: 10.22051/tqh.2021.34049.3045
VANCOUVER
Sharifinasab, H., Faghizadeh, A. Analysis of Allameh Tabatabai's method in interpreting general and absolute verses in a specific context. Researches of Quran and Hadith Sciences, 2021; 18(3): 33-67. doi: 10.22051/tqh.2021.34049.3045