In the reflection of the Christian beliefs about Mary in the verses of the Qur'an, the concept of "Mariolatry" mentioned in verse Mᾱ'idah: 116 and some other verses is one of the challenging concepts that, especially in terms of knowing its audience, so far, many efforts have been made. In this article, we try to investigate these views and find a way out of its interpretation challenge. The main question in this research is: "How is the concept of Mariolatry reflected in the Qur'an and how has it been understood by Muslim commentators and Western Qur'an scholars so far?" "How should the Quranic verses related to this interpretation be read to solve the existing challenges regarding it?" Findings show that both groups of commentators have diversely interpreted the above concept so that their total views fluctuate from distorting the Quranic verses to linguistic and historical approaches. Meanwhile, examining the context of the verses of the Qur'an and some surviving documents from the late ancient period, as well as paying attention to some of the disadvantages of the historical approach, show that the reading of this belief based on the language and rhetorical creativity of the Qur'an is more justified and logical.
Griffith, S. H. (2007). “Arabic Christianity in the Monasteries of Ninth-Century Palestine.” Trans. Wahid Safri. Nashrīye Haft Āsmān. 9/34: pp. 128-73. [In Persian]
Griffith, S. H. (2020). “Christians and Christianity.” Encyclopedia of the Qur'an. Hasan Razaʾi Haftador. Tehran: Hikmat. V.5: pp. 145-136. [In Persian]
Ibn Ḥazm Andalusī, ʿAlī ibn Aḥmad (nd). Al-Faṣl fī al-Milal wa al-Ahwāʾ wa al-Niḥal. Qāhirah: Maktabat al-Khānajī. [In Arabic].
Ibn Hishām, ʿAbd al-Malik (1955). Al-Sīrah al-Nabawiyyah li Ibn Hishām. Taḥqīq: Muṣṭafā al-Suqā wa Ibrāhīm al-Abiyārī wa ʿAbd al-Ḥafīẓ al-Shalabī. Ṭibʿah al-Thānīyah. [In Arabic]
Māwardī, ʿAlī ibn Muḥammad (nd). Tafsīr al-Māwardī = Al-Nuḳaṭ wa al-ʿUyūn. Bayrūt: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyyah. [In Arabic]
Mitchell, Thomas F. (2002). Christian Theology. Trans. Husayin Tawfighi. Qum: Markaz Muṭālaʿāt wa Taḥqīqāt Adyān wa Mazāhib. Ṭabʿah Dūm. [In Persian]
Mohagheghian, Z. (2021). “The Concept of "Jesus, The Son of God" in the Qur'an and Islamic Tradition.” Pazhuheshnāmeh Tafsīr wa Zabān-i Qurʾān. 10/19: pp. 232-213. [In Persian].
Mohagheghian, Z. (2021). Sexuality and Sexual Symbolisms in the Qur’an. Tehran: Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies. [In Persian]
Mohagheghian, Z. (2024). The Idea of 'Banāt Allāh' (Daughters of Allah): From Classical to Modern Qur'anic Scholarships. Tehran: Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies. [In Persian]
Muqātil ibn Sulaymān (2002). Tafsīr Muqātil ibn Sulaymān. Bayrūt: Dār Iḥyāʾ al-Turāth. [In Arabic]
Shafi’i, Saʿid (2021). Christian Audiences of the Qur'an from the Perspective of Western Qur'anic Scholars; A Case Study of Sidney Griffith's Perspective. Maṭālaʿāt Qurʾān wa Ḥadīth. 29: pp. 278-255. [In Persian]
Shahrestānī, Muḥammad ibn ʿAbd al-Karīm (nd). Al-Milal wa al-Niḥal. Muʾassasah al-Ḥalabī. [In Arabic]
Sulaymani, ʿAbd al-Rahim (2016). Reflecting the Christian Trinity in the Qur'an. Pāzhuḥeshnāmeh Adyān, 19: pp. 83-105. [In Persian]
Ashe, G. (1988). The Virgin: Mary’s Cult and the Re-emergence of the Goddess.
Bashear, Suliman (1997). Arabs and Others in Early Islam. Darwin Press.
Bell, R. (1968). The Origin of Islam in Its Christian Environment.
Block, C. (2014). The Qur’an in Christian-Muslim Dialogue: Historical and Modern Interpretations.
Carroll, M. P. (1986). The Cult of the Virgin Mary: Psychological Origins.Princeton University Press.
Crone, P. (2016). The Qur’anic Pagans and Related Matters.
Cuypers, M. (2009). The Banquet: A Reading of the Fifth Surah of the Qur’an(trans. P. Kelley). Convivium Press.
Davidson, J. (2005). The Odes of Solomon: Mystical Songs from the Time of Jesus.Clear Press.
De Blois, F. (2004). Naṣrānī and Ḥanīf: Studies on the Religious Vocabulary of Christianity and Islam. 65: pp. 1-30.
Goudarzi, M. (2023). “The Eucharist in the Qur’an”. Islam. and Christian–Muslim Relations.34(2): pp. 113-133.
Goudarzi, M. (forthcoming). “The Qur’an’s Cultic Trinity: Marian Piety in Late Antiquity and the Qur’an.” Late Antiquity.
Griffith, S. H. (2007). “Syriacisms in the Arabic Qur'an: Who Were Those Who Said "Allah Is Third of Three"?”In M. Bar-Asher. S. Hopkins. S. Stroumsa. & B. Chiesa (Eds.). A Word Fitly Spoken: Studies in Medieval Exegeses of the Hebrew Bible and the Qur'an (pp. 83-110). The Ben-Zvi Institute.
Griffith, S. H. (2011). Al-Naṣārā in the Qurʾān: A Hermeneutical Reflection. In G. S. Reynolds (Ed.). New Perspectives on the Qurʾān: The Qurʾān in Its Historical Context 2 (pp. 301-322). Routledge.
Haddad, S. K. (1992). The Principles of Religion in the Qur’ān and the Bible.
Hawting, G. R. (1999). The Idea of Idolatry and the Emergence of Islam.Cambridge University Press.
Mohagheghian, Z. (2023). “Mariolatry in the Qur'an: A Critical Review of the Book Mary in the Qur'an: Friend of God. Virgin. Mother”. International Online Conference. November 1-2. 2023. Printed version. in Studies in Interreligious Dialogue (forthcoming).
Mohagheghian, Z. (forthcoming). “Mary’s Narrative in the Qurʾan: Repressive or Emancipatory?”.
Muir, W. (1858–1861). The Life of Mahomet and History of Islam. to the Era of the Hegira(4 vols.). Smith. Elder & Co.
Parrinder, G. (1996). Jesus in the Qur’ān.Barnes & Noble. (Original work published 1965).
Reynolds, G. S. (2014). “On the Presentation of Christianity in the Qurʾān and the Many Aspects of Qur’anic Rhetoric.”Al-Bayān Journal of Qurʾān and Ḥadīth Studies. 12: pp. 42-54.
Shoemaker, S. J. (2008). “The Cult of the Virgin in the Fourth Century: A Fresh Look at Some Old and New Sources.”Early Christian Studies. 16(3): pp. 371-401.
Sinai, N. (2023). Al-Naṣārā: An Excerpt from His Recent and Unpublished Work: pp. 666-678.
Sirry, M. A. (2014). Scriptural Polemics: The Qur'an and Other Religions.Oxford University Press.
Tatari, M. & Von Stosch. K. (2021). Mary in the Qur’an: Friend of God. Virgin. Mother. Trans: P. Lewis. Trans. Gingko.
The Panarion of Epiphanius of Salamis. (1994). Trans: F. Williams. Brill.
Van der Velden, F. (2008). “Kotexte im Konvergenzstrang – Die Bedeutung Textkritischer Varianten und Christlicher Bezugstexte für die Redaktion von Sure 61 und Sure 5”.110-119. OrChr. 92. Pp130–173.
Von Stosch, K. (nd). “Jesus and Mary in Surāt al-Māʾida (Q. 5): An Anti-Imperial Discourse in the Qur‘ān as a Critique of the Byzantine Misuse of Christology.”Unpublished article.
Zwemer, S. (2005). The Moslem Christ: An Essay on the Life, Character, and Teachings of Jesus Christ: According to the Koran and Orthodox Tradition.Diggory Press.
Mohagheghian, Z. (2024). Mariolatry (Marianism) in the Qur'an: A Comparative Analysis of Islamic and Western Scholarship. Researches of Quran and Hadith Sciences, 21(2), 165-203. doi: 10.22051/tqh.2024.46106.4097
MLA
Mohagheghian, Z. . "Mariolatry (Marianism) in the Qur'an: A Comparative Analysis of Islamic and Western Scholarship", Researches of Quran and Hadith Sciences, 21, 2, 2024, 165-203. doi: 10.22051/tqh.2024.46106.4097
HARVARD
Mohagheghian, Z. (2024). 'Mariolatry (Marianism) in the Qur'an: A Comparative Analysis of Islamic and Western Scholarship', Researches of Quran and Hadith Sciences, 21(2), pp. 165-203. doi: 10.22051/tqh.2024.46106.4097
CHICAGO
Z. Mohagheghian, "Mariolatry (Marianism) in the Qur'an: A Comparative Analysis of Islamic and Western Scholarship," Researches of Quran and Hadith Sciences, 21 2 (2024): 165-203, doi: 10.22051/tqh.2024.46106.4097
VANCOUVER
Mohagheghian, Z. Mariolatry (Marianism) in the Qur'an: A Comparative Analysis of Islamic and Western Scholarship. Researches of Quran and Hadith Sciences, 2024; 21(2): 165-203. doi: 10.22051/tqh.2024.46106.4097